because in my opinion they simply don t look right.....don't convey what I think would look good on the rear of a mustangTony Alonso said:Why do you think they are ugly?
And what would look good? Just curious as to what specific shape you are referencing...texasbullitt said:because in my opinion they simply don t look right.....don't convey what I think would look good on the rear of a mustang
Tony Alonso said:And what would look good? Just curious as to what specific shape you are referencing...
To me, that spoiler looks similar to the one on the current GT500.
So long as they don't go down the Mustang II retro-road.BigBullitt said:I'd like to see them incorporate the concave tail lights of the 67/68 somehow. I have a feeling that they will still try to mimic the overall design of the 65 through 70 cars for awhile (you have to admit, they are similar to an extent.) I wonder if at some time they will try to progress to the 71-73 style.
Of course there is no issue about not liking it. I, in fact, don't like the GT500 spoiler because of its depth and angle at which it sets. That, of course, would not preclude me from owning one (just money)!texasbullitt said:what looks good to you is good for you ok tony?
I do not like the looks....... its that simple , I hope it is all right with you that I have my own likes and dislikes ( opinion)