[mustang]

In the November issue: Good write up on the Bullitt, disappointed in the power and acceleration performance. E/Ts best [email protected] with 2.09 60 ft times. Dyno test 236.5 Horse Power @ rear wheels
and 279.8 lbs per foot.
Has anyone had their Bullitt dyno?

 

[texasbullitt]

what article/magazine was this in?

 

[mustang 1]

Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords has the articlt that you are refering too in the November edition.

 

[JayP]

239.5 HP
274.9 LBFT

I have the charts scanned at my site-
http://home.earthlink.net/~palmerj

 

[mustang]

According to Mustangs & Fast Fords 236.8 hp @ rear wheels and 279.8 lbs-ft.E/T Times in same car [email protected] 2.09s 60 foot times.
This is from November issue

 

[Green Monster]

Don't those number equate to roughly 275Hp and 325 lb-ft of torque at the flywheel? Based on the Trap and the Dyno those numbers are showing me that the Bullit is underrated.

 

[llama_boy]

Try the Dyno forum it has alot of good information on this.

http://www.bullittclub.com/phpBB/viewforum.php?forum=18&91

 

[Pony XTC]

That same article said the stock 01' GT was stronger than the Bullitt. UGH

 

[JB VOBRA]

fellas,

I responded to this on another thread: those MMFF dyno numbers are STD corrected and not the more widely accepted SAE dyno correction. If that car was really 237rwhp and 279rwtq, 98.5 would NOT have been it's highest trap. Probably closer to 100.5 with Evan Smith driving. I'd bet the SAE numbers for #0028 are under 230rwhp and under 270rwtq. MMFF did the same thing the month before when they dynoed a 2001 cobra.

for comparison, mine dynos 239.3rwhp/275.3rwtq SAE. It's trapped over 101 in houston summer heat.

the "M" in MMFF stands for meatballs. their content is always suspect.



<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: JB VOBRA on 2001-10-04 21:07 ]</font>

 

[Green Monster]

What's the diff. between STD and SAE. I've never even heard of the STD method. Must be an old style of testing. MMFF needs to be clear on these things. I thought it was SAE corrected the whole time.

 

[JB VOBRA]

Green, click on this link:

http://www.corral.net/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=28588


looks like about a 3% bulge for STD numbers over SAE. So 236 STD X 97% = 229 SAE and 279 STD X 97% = 270 SAE

 

[mustang]

DHG #0148 Just got back from Higgins Ford Performance Dyno run:SAE Ratings
1st run 232.2 hp 270.3 tq
2nd run 234.9 hp 282.5 tq
3rd run 237.o hp 279.4 tq

Only mod is a K&N filter

I quess I'm satisfied that I have a 275 hp Bullitt as told when I first bought the car.

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: mustang on 2001-11-06 09:35 ]</font>