[TrueBullittBlue]

Which is best? What are your findings and opinions?

Here's what TireRack says...

http://www.tirerack.com/suspension/tests/eibach_hr_rd.htm

 

[silverwolf]

I would go with the H&R sports. I have a 99 gt and I went with the H&R's and Tokico struts and shocks. It rides better than before and it is lowered to the height it should come from the factory, in my mind.

 

[TrueBullittBlue]

Which H&R's? Sportline? How much of a drop did you get? I'm thinking of only doing on the rear wheels because they look so much higher than the front.

 

[merc50]

here is a pic of mine with sportlines on it.

 

[TrueBullittBlue]

Okay, I'm convinced. Any rubbing problems? How's the feel: drive and handling?

Too bad the rims we got are 17's. 18 woulda looked so much better lowered.

 

[llama_boy]

Damn, that looks sa-weet!

 

[merc50]

no rubbing or anything. even during HARD Braking ther is no rub.

 

[tracktoy]

well, here is testimony from an H&R user. i love them. all my complaints from a previous post are now gone. (i got to get rid of this crown vic suspension) the nose dive is minimized, lane shifts are stable, and the brakes feel better. Not taking anything away from the eibach setup because i am sure they would have done all i wanted too. I chose the H&R's because the spring rate was stiffer, and for the streets of d.c. i need a little more ground clearance.

Only complaint is, in the driver side fender well, the tire will rub the wheel well (plastic part) in a deep corner, how ever the only reason this happend is because FORD didnt attach that side correctly or something. the other side is fine. i have pictures but i need to scan them. the springs along with the 30mm H&R spacers makes for one mean bullitt.

Pics will be up soon!!!